Use of Scleral Graft (Auto Graft) in Corneal Perforation (A Current Study)

Purpose To determine the efficacy of scleral graft (autograft) in corneal perforation, it was a nonrandomized prospective study, in Department of Ophthalmology, Chandka Medical College Hospital Shaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto Medical University, Larkana from 01-03-2020 to 31-08-2020.

Material and Methods: The patients selected from Out Patient Department and admitted in Ophthalmology department patients with complication of corneal perforation, secondary to non traumatic or traumatic eyes. Ages of the patients range from 15 to 50 years and in both gender included in this study and some patient excluded with the history of collagen vascular disorder, ocular surgery and scleral disease.

Results: We studied efficacy of scleral autograft in 52 eyes of 52 patients. Out of which 27 (51.92%) were males and 25(48.07%) were females.27(51.92%) patients had central corneal perforation,12(23.07%) had para-central while 13(25%) patients had peripheral corneal perforations. On second postoperative day 4 (7.69%) patients developed shallow anterior chamber with leakage which were resutured. After two weeks 01 (1.92%) patient developed graft suture abscess, which were managed with antimicrobial therapy. After 3 weeks of surgery 39 (59%) patients developed corneal vascularization. Anti VEGF therapy was given to the patients sub-conjunctivally and intra-stromal,that may result regression of corneal vascularization in 32 (61.53%) patients.

Conclusion. We concluded that scleral autograft is cost effective, easily available method in the management of corneal perforation. Moreover this method is superior to other available methods, as corneal perforation is an emergency and this method is easily available and free from screening and rejection problems.

Key words: corenal perforation, scleral autograft.

Received: July’2020    Accepted Sep’2020

INTRODUCTION

 

The corneal perforations1 are complications cases of various ocular pathologies2. They are classified into traumatic3,4 and non-traumatic causes, which include sharp and blunt objects resulting in lacerated and punctured wounds with perforation. Trauma may be associated with infections, including most commonly bacterial and fungal infections, which may also occur without prior trauma and if not treated within time, leading to perforation5,6,7,8. Infection is most common cause of corneal perforation9. Sequence of events in corneal infections include direct infiltration of micro-organisms, proteolytic enzymes secreted by organisms, inflammatory cells, repeated damage of epithelial cells and decreased corneal sensitivity, all facilitate progression of corneal perforation.

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Scleral autograft is cost effective, easily

available method in the management of corneal

perforation. Moreover, this method is superior to

other available methods, as corneal perforation

is an emergency and this method is easily

approachable, free from screening and rejection

problems.

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Bacterial micro-organisms which infect cornea includes Pseudomonas aeruginosa, streptococcus species, staphylococcus species and salmonella species. Fungal infections commonly infecting organisms include Fusarium solani, aspergilus fumigates, Pencillium citrinium, Candida albicans, cephalosporium cuvularia10. Protozoa like acantha amoeba can cause ulceration and perforation in contact lens wearers with history of swimming in dirty water11.Inadequate tear film and ocular surface disorders may also cause ulceration and perforation12. Other causes include neurotrophic ulcer, exposure keratitis13 and rarely hydrops with keratoconus14. Inflammatory pathologies cause corneal thinning and subsequent ulceration and perforation15. Collagen vascular disorders include Rheumatoid arthritis16, Systemic lupus erythematosis, wegners granulomatosis and other inflammatory causes include Poly arteritis nodosa, sarcoidosis, inflammatory bowel disease which may cause thinning and perforation. Degeneration and ectasia: like Terriens marginal degeneration, Pellucid marginal degeneration may end-up in corneal ulceration and perforation17. Dry eye and xerosis caused by Kerato-conjunctivitis sicca, Vitamin A Deficiency, ocular Cicatricial pemphigoid, steven Johnson syndrome, Sjogren syndrome may lead to corneal ulceration and perforation. Management of corneal perforation relies upon etiology, site, size and previously taken treatment. Corneal perforation usually present with shallow anterior chamber with visible perforation site. In some cases, site of corneal perforation is obscured by necrotic, infiltrated or oedematous tissue with minimally shallow anterior chamber. In these cases of siedel test is diagnostic. Cause of corneal perforation is mostly evident but in certain cases it must be investigated thoroughly. The Aim of treatment is not only to save integrity of globe but also to treat underlying cause. Treatment options presently available are tarsorraphy, tissue adhesives ie fibrin glue or cyano acrylate glue,18,19 conjunctival flapping, bandage contact lens, tectonic scleral autograft, amniotic membrane transplantation20 and lamellor penetrating keratoplaty.21

 

MATERIAL AND METHODS:

 

The prospective study for assessment of efficacy of scleral autograft in corneal perforation is performed at the department of Ophthalmology Chandka medical college hospital Larkana on after approval from Ethical Review Committee SMBBMU Larkana. Patients with corneal perforation, were selected from Out Patients Department (OPD) are admitted in Ophthalmology department With the complication of corneal perforation secondary to non-traumatic (corneal ulcer) or traumatic corneal perforation. Total number of cases were 52, ages range from 15 to 50 years and both gender were included in this study and some patients were excluded with history of collagen vascular disorders, ocular surgery and scleral disease. All patients underwent visual status with assessment on visual acuity chart both distance and near with best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and slit lamp examination, fundus examination and tonometry for intraocular pressure, laboratory investigations and ultra-sonography was done. The procedure of scleral graft (autograft) was explained to the patient and written consent taken from all patients. Patients were also informed regarding course of recovery, importance of follow up visits and necessity of other additional surgery including keratoplasty. Technique. First of all, the area of corneal perforation was measured with keratometer, to obtain a little bigger sized scleral lamellar button. Limbal based conjunctival flap was formed at the area adjacent to corneal perforation in a way similar as in trabeculectomy. In peripheral corneal perforation a partial thickness scleral flap (rotational) was made with its intact base, is rotated back to cover the corneal perforation and a separate flap of partial thickness of sclera was obtained to cover perforated area in central or para-central corneal perforations. Care was taken to make larger scleral flap in order to cover the whole area of corneal perforation, to avoid leakage. 10/0 nylon sutures were applied with burying knots toward corneal area. Conjunctiva was closed with 8/0 silk suture and therapeutic bandage contact lens was applied to avoid foreign body sensation. After doing scleral grafts in corneal perforations, all patients were examined on its 1st postoperative day. Visual acuity checked for improvement. All patients were examined on slit lamp for stability of graft including any leakage and status of anterior chamber. Patients were checked for any inflammation and infection. Intra ocular pressure was checked on noncontact tonometer (Pneumo- tonometer). All patients were prescribed oral as well as topical antimicrobial (Moxifloxacin eye drops) therapy along with topical steroid eye drops (Dexamethasone eye drops) to prevent infection and inflammation. Patients were discharged from hospital on 1st postoperative day and checked after 01 week on follow up visit. Whole exercise was repeated again including visual acuity testing, slit lamp examination and intra ocular pressure checking. All patients were assessed on 3rd, 4th weeks and after 2 months with visual acuity testing, slit lamp examination and intra ocular pressure was checked by noncontact tonometer. All the collected information was entered into the predesigned performa. Statistical analysis was done through SPSS 22.0 Version mean + standard deviation were calculated for age, duration for corneal perforation, frequency and percentage were calculated for gender, efficacy of scleral auto-graft - yes/no, post stratification applies chi-square taken p-value less than 0.05 as significant.

 

RESULT

 

This study was conducted on 52 patients out of which 27 (51.92%) were male and 25 (48.07%) were female. (Figure 1) Age ranged from 15 to 50 years. (Table 1)Mean age is 35 years. 52 patients were operated for corneal perforation (Figure 2-A), 27 (51.92%) out of 52 patients had central corneal perforation (Figure 2-B), 12 (23.07%) had para central corneal perforation while 13 (25%) (Table 2) had peripheral corneal perforations. According to etiology of 29 ( 55.76%) patients had previous fungal corneal ulcers, 15 (28.84%) were suffering from bacterial corneal ulcers while remaining 08(15.38%) had corneal perforations due to trauma. On 1st postoperative day 4 (7.69%) patients developed anterior chamber leakage with shallow anterior chamber, confirmed on siedel test, and were managed successfully. (Table 3) After one week of surgery, all patients had adequate anterior chamber. 16 (30.76%) patients were complaining of foreign body sensation and watering was improved in 28 patients (53.84%) to 6/60, in 14 (26.92%) patients to 6/24 and in 10 (19.23%) (Table.4) patient’s vision improved 6/18, specially in peripheral corneal perforations. After two weeks of surgery 01 (1.92%) patient developed suture abscess with hypopyon formation. (Figure 3-A and 3-B) All other patients had stable visual acuity, adequate anterior chamber depth and intra ocular pressure within normal range, with well placement of scleral autograft. After 3 weeks of surgery 31 (59.61%) patients developed corneal vascularization and after 4 weeks of surgery 08 (15.38%) more patients developed corneal vascularization. 05 (9.61%) patients had central or para-central corneal perforation. (Figure 4) While 03 (5.76%) had peripheral corneal perforation. (Figure 5-A and 5-B) All other patients had stable visual acuity, adequate anterior chamber and intraocular pressure below 16mm Hg . After 6 weeks of surgery, 32 (61.53%) patients were managed for corneal vascularization, improved regarding symptoms of foreign body sensation and photophobia. After 8 weeks of surgery, 15 (28%) patients developed spontaneous extension of graft due to loosening of sutures. Healing under the graft were observed with scar formation. (Figure 6) After 12 weeks of surgery, 24 (46.15%) patients were referred to the center where keratoplasty facility was available.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DISCUSSION

 

Corneal perforation is an emergency which should be dealt promptly. Methods of management includes bandage contact lens, adhesive glues. Amniotic membrane transplantation, keratoplasty and conjunctival flapping. Bandage contact lens and adhesive glues are more effective in small corneal perforation, which are 1-2 mm in size. Conjunctival flapping is mostly considered when visual prognosis is poor. Amniotic membrane transplantation is an effective method but also carries storage problems because corneal perforation is an emergency and there is no prior warning to obtain donor tissue. Moreover, it also has screening, rejection problems and conjunctival flapping mostly used if no hope of vision. In this context, a method was needed which fulfill all requirements, so tectonic sclera autograft is cost effective, easily available method which can save the integrity of globe in emergencies. In our study, 52 eyes of 52 patients with corneal perforations were operated with sclera autograft. 39 (75%) cases developed corneal vascularization, 04 (7.69%) cases developed anterior chamber leakage and 01 (1.92%) case developed infection (suture abscess). According to our knowledge this is the new study in Pakistan of sceral autograft in the management of corneal perforation, however this study already have been done in other countries. Pawan Prasher et al22 described the case report of a patient with paracentral corneal perforation which after 3 months of scleral autograft improved vision less than 6/60 with stable anterior chamber and focal posterior synachiae. In our study after 3 months , in 28 patients (53.84%) vision improved to less than 6/60 , in 14 patients (26.92%) patients vision improved to less than 6/24 and in 10 (19.23%) patients vision improved to 6/18. J. I. Praydal et al23 reported 3 cases of peripheral corneal perforation in which vision was less than 6/60 at the time of perforation and after scleral autograft surgery, vision recovered to 6/9. In our study 13 (25%) patients were operated who had peripheral corneal perforation. Their vision was improved to less than 6/18. In another study of Zhong Quo,Xio Chang et al24 they described the report of 18 cases of corneal perforation. 05 (27.77%) cases had avulsive laceration, severe corneal fistula in 08 (44.44%) cases and localized Staphyloma of cornea in 02 cases. In our study 39 (75%) patients developed corneal vascularization, 04 (7.69%) cases developed anterior chamber leakage while one(1.92%) case developed infection (suture abscess). No case of corneal fistula or Staphyloma was seen. Maurice D.Met al25 described the report of 14 cases of scleral autograft with 02 (14.28%) cases of anterior chamber leakage on second postoperative day, with no sign of infection or inflammation seen. In our study of 52 cases, we observed 04(7.69%) cases with anterior chamber leakage on second postoperative day. Cheng C.l., Tan DT et al26 described the report of 06 cases of scleral autograft, in which 04(66.66%) cases developed corneal vascularization after 3 weeks. In our study 39 (75%) cases developed corneal vascularization after one month of surgery. Maria T, Iradier MD et al27 described the report of 12 cases of scleral autograft with 01 (8.33%) case of infection (endophthalmitis) on second postoperative day. In our study of 52 cases, 01 (1.92%) case of infection (suture abscess) was seen after 3 weeks of surgery.

 

CONCLUSION

 

This study concludes that scleral graft is an effective and easily available method for management of corneal perforation. This method has advantage of being easily available in emergency situations, is cost effective, safe as there is no need of screening and there is no expected graft rejection problems.

 

1. Management of corneal perforation. Surv Ophthalmol. Nov-Dec 2011;56(6):522-38. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2011.06.003.

2. Vinger PF. The eye and sports medicine.In Tasman W,Jaeger EA,eds.Duane’s Ophthalmology.15th ed.Pa:Lippincot Williams&Wilkions;2009:chap 45.

3. SubabaraoIet al eds.American Medical Association.Handbook of first Aid and Emergency care,New york N.Y:Random House ;2009 Best practice: Eye trauma, British Medical Journal,updated June 2014.

4. Miller D.Pharmacological treatment of infections corneal ulcers. Expert opinion Pharmecother:2013 Apr:14 (5):543-60.

5. Park J,Lee KM,Zhou H,Rabin M,Juso K,Burton WB et al.Community practice and patterns of bacterial corneal ulcer evaluation and treatment.Eye contact lens 2015 jan;41(1):12-8.

6. Gorrett S,Bacterial keratitis Preferred practice pattern,American Academy of Ophthalmology,2013.

7. Abbott H.R,Half penny C,Zegans.M, Karamer P. “Bacterial corneal ulcers.Duan. SClinical Ophthalmology 12th edition volume 4,chapter 18,lippincot,williams & wilkins,philadelphia PA,2013.

8. V Janjhi,A.L.Young, J.S Mehta,N. Sharma,T.Agarwal and R.B. Vajpaee, “Management of corneal perforation” Survey of Ophthalmology,vol.56,no.6,pp.522-538,2011.

9. Keenan J,Mcleod SD,Fungal keratitis In:YannofM,Duker JS,eds.Ophthalmology.4th edst:Louis,Mo:Elsevier Mosby 2013 chap4.12.

10. Rasoulinejad S A,Sadeghi M,Mortazeri M,Hidayati Goudargi H,Mortazi M,Akbarian N. clinical presentation and Microbial Analysis of contact lens keratitis an epidemiologic study. Emerg(Tehran) 2014 Autumn; 2(4):174-7.

11. The definition and classification of dry eye disease:report of the definition and classification. Subcommittee of the International Dry eye workshop(2007)Ocul Surf.Apr:5(2):75-92.

12. Yanoff M,et al.Noninfectious keratitis Ophthalmology.4th ed.philadelphia 47.Jacob DS,Evaluation of the red eye. http:www.uptodate.com/home.Accessed June 28,2015.(exp Keratitis).

13. Mohammad Reza Panahi Bazez,MD.Farideh sharifpour,MD,Ali Reza Moghaddasi,MD et al;J ophthalmic Vis Res 2014 Jan;9(1):101-105.

14. Sharma N, Macleod Sinha G, Shekhar H, Tityal JS, Agarwal T, Chawla B et al. “Demographic profile, clinical features and outcome of peripheral ulcerative keratitis”a prospective study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2015. Nov.99 (11):1503-8.

15. Feist E,Pleyer U.“Diseases of the outer eye in rheumatoid arthritis”.2 Rheumatol.2010;69:403-410 doi:10.1007/S 00393- 009-0577-5.

16. External disease and cornea.section 8.Basic and clinical science course,Amercian Academy of ophthalmology-2011-2012.339- 340(Terriens marginal degeneration)

17. A.Sharma,K.Mohan,R.sharma and V.S Nirankari,”Scleral patch graft augmented cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive for treatment of moderate sized noninfectious corneal perforation (3.5-4.5 mm) Cornea vol.32,no. 10,pp.1306-1330,2013.

18. Ghandhewar J,Savant V.Pryerel J.Dua M.Double drape tectonic patch with cyanoacrylate glue in the management of corneal perforation with iris incarceration Cornea 2013:32(5) 137-8.

19. H.K.Kim and H.S.Park,“Fibrin glue-assisted augmented amniotic membrane transplantation for the treatment of large noninfectious corneal perforation”,Cornea,vol.28,no.2,pp.170-176, 2009.

20. J.H.Jang and S.D Chang “Tectonic deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty in impending corneal perforation using cryo preserved cornea”, Korean Journal of Ophthalmology,vol.25, no. 2,pp.132-135,2011.

21. Pawan prasher et al. “Use of an autologus lamellar sclera graft to repair a corneal perforation”August 2014,volume 34,issue4. pp.957-960.

22. J I Prydal Etal. “Use of autologus lamellar sclera graft to repair a corneal perforation”.Br J Ophthalmol. 2006 July:90 (7):924- 925.

23. Zhongquo,Xiu fuo, Chong Jian et al. “Repair of cornea-scleral defect by autologus sclera graft from the same eye” 1997 July:11(4):206-7.

24. Maurice DM,Singh T. “The fate of sclera grafts in cornea” Cornea 1996.15024. 209.

25. CL Cheng,Tan DT et el. “Lamellar corneal autograft for corneal perforation” AUS NZ J. Ophthalmol.1999 Dec:27(6):437-9.

26. Maria T,Iradier MD,Phd;Laura P.Fernendez, MD,“Scleral graft in corneal perforation:When is less more” AAO:2014.